New imports standards at centre of FAO meeting debates

The 10th meeting of the FAO Sub-Committee on Fish Trade held in Santiago de Compostela, Spain was marked by “vigorous” debate among the 61 participating countries regarding the increasingly complex challenges of responsibly managing the globe-spanning fish trade sector.
Questions regarding new safety, quality, traceability and eco-labeling standards which are being increasingly imposed on fish imports by many authorities and retailers in the developed world featured prominently in the discussions.according to FAO.
Developing countries in particular noted that complying with such standards involves significant financial and technical burdens, especially since they are not universal but often vary greatly from market to market.
“We heard from all the delegations that ensuring consumer safety and bringing products to market that come from sustainable fisheries is of course extremely important,” explained Jorge Zuzunaga of Peru, who chaired the meeting. “It’s just that, as one delegate put it, a ‘bewildering array’ of different standards are being applied to fish imports, which can create confusion and problems -- especially for countries where production comes from small-scale or artisanal fishers.”
Developing countries rely heavily on fish exports to the developed world. They represent an important source of employment as well as a leading source of foreign exchange -- net earnings from fish trade by developing nations currently run over $20 billion a year.
“The challenge is two-fold,” commented Grimur Valdimarsson, Director of FAO’s Fisheries Industry Division. “First, making sure that import standards are fair and based on good science, and second, helping developing countries with resources and know-how so they can meet them.”
Noting that most of the fish that is consumed worldwide is produced by developing nations, he said that FAO would like to see more importing countries providing such assistance.
According to Valdimarsson, another trend which emerged from the talks is a spreading understanding among fish-exporting countries that more rigorous management is critical in order to ensure the sustainability of fisheries and the future of the fish export sector.
FAO assessments of wild fish stocks show that out of the 600 major commercial species groups monitored by the Organisation, 25 percent are either overexploited, depleted, or recovering from depletion.
“The countries here agreed that we don’t want to see the number of overexploited or depleted stocks grow,” Valdimarsson said. “If there are fewer fish, that is obviously not good for the people who depend on fishing to earn their living.”
Around 200 million people worldwide earn all or part of their living from the fisheries sector and related industries, according to FAO.
These and other issues will be the subject of follow-up talks on proposed FAO guidelines on responsible fish trade, which the Organisation presented in draft form to the Sub-Committee last week.
Though participating countries endorsed the idea of a voluntary set of guidelines aimed at ensuring that the fish trade does not undermine the responsible management of fisheries resources, they stopped short of adopting them. Instead, they recommended that the guidelines undergo additional work in order to better reflect ongoing changes in the international regimes governing fish trade.